Difference between revisions of "Digitization Selection Policy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Print resources identified and obtained via the Collections Development process and Projects are prioritized for digitization and digital preservation based on the following c...") |
m (Natkeeran moved page Template:Digitization Selection Policy to Digitization Selection Policy) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Manager must take input from the Collections Development process mentor/co-mentor and | Manager must take input from the Collections Development process mentor/co-mentor and | ||
project coordinators. | project coordinators. | ||
− | |||
* Rare materials, specifically palm-leaf manuscripts, historic inscriptions, rare artifacts without copyright issues. | * Rare materials, specifically palm-leaf manuscripts, historic inscriptions, rare artifacts without copyright issues. | ||
* Books in the public domain. | * Books in the public domain. |
Latest revision as of 13:03, 27 June 2020
Print resources identified and obtained via the Collections Development process and Projects are prioritized for digitization and digital preservation based on the following criteria. It is the responsibility of the Program Manager to identify the resources for digitization. The Program Manager must take input from the Collections Development process mentor/co-mentor and project coordinators.
- Rare materials, specifically palm-leaf manuscripts, historic inscriptions, rare artifacts without copyright issues.
- Books in the public domain.
- Books with permission or with high likelihood of obtaining permission.
- Resources from Special Collections, including archival records.
- Magazines and Journals
- Newspapers with permission or with very high likelihood of obtaining permission.
- Archival Records
- Other Publications
Note that the resources that need to be returned are prioritized than those in the Noolaham Foundation office. However, the office collections should not be sitting for an unreasonable amount of time (i.e more than one year), as that can violate this criteria.